The danger in the Zaporizhia Nuclear Power Plant arose due to the disconnection of the plant from the Ukrainian power grid, caused by enemy fire and a fire at the plant. – Russia is only interested in maintaining the worst situation for the longest possible time. This can only be prevented by strengthening sanctions and […]Zelenskiy: Zaporizhia Nuclear Power Plant is once again one step away from a radiation disaster
The American intelligence does not provide the Ukrainians with all the information
American intelligence is not allowed to inform Ukrainian partners about the location of individual Russian commanders or politicians. Nor can they help them attack targets in Russia, according to Joe Biden’s administration guidelines, which the Washington Post reported. The idea is to avoid Russia’s accusation and not to lead to US-Russian confrontation.
” President Joe Biden’s administration has developed guidelines for sharing intelligence with Ukraine . They are designed to avoid escalating tensions between Washington and Moscow . The recommendations contain two broad prohibitions.
The US cannot provide Ukraine with detailed data that would assist in killing key Russian commanders. or politicians , such as the chief of the general staff or the minister of defense. The second forbidden category is any information that helps Ukraine in attacking enemy targets outside the country (ie on the territory of Russia – ed.) “- emphasized in the article.
As reported by the American daily, concerns about the Kremlin ‘s reaction to the second type of US support for Ukraine prompted the White House to suspend plans to provide Poland with fighters to Ukraine . The Ukrainian side could use these machines to launch attacks on Russian territory , which would be contrary to American guidelines.
No high-level target data available
The United States also adopted a rule that prohibits disclosure of “target information ” to Ukraine . In practice, this means that Washington is not sharing reports that a particular Russian general has been spotted in a particular location , nor is it assisting Kiev in carrying out attacks on such persons or objects. However, it is allowed to provide data on enemy command and control centers, which are places where senior Russian officers are frequently present.
According to the Washington Post, such information could ” help Ukraine in its own defense “. If the Ukrainian commanders decided to hit such a facility, it would be their decision – the authors of the article assessed. They also indicated that an example of cooperation with Kiev , which leads to the destruction of enemy units, but does not exhaust the definition of US direct responsibility , was the sinking of the Russian cruiser “Moscow” by Ukrainians , which took place on April 14.
“Then Moscow would have an argument to answer”
“If the United States were supplying information about targets to a foreign entity and we were closely involved in making decisions about targets, then we would be directing the force and they would act on our behalf,” said Scott R. Anderson , a former State Department official and former adviser. Legal of the US Embassy in Baghdad . “It could be seen as approaching the border of a real attack on Russia , and then Moscow would have an argument to respond,” he stressed.
Hacker attacks on the country have also escalated in recent months,while shells are falling on Ukraine.Ukranians are also giving Russians a tough time there.
Cybera attck is a new form warware where hackers try to break the fighting spirit of a nation. This is very relevant to the war against Ukraine, where hackers on both sides are trying to demoralise and disrupt the enemy away from the front. Read more at
With the war showing no signs of appeasing its devastation and the climate of negotiations now steadily traveling along the tracks of tension , peace in Ukraine seems increasingly distant. The latest threat launched by Vladimir Putin to the West, considered co-belligerent of Ukraine for having sent weapons and war material , also comes to further stir the waters .
If Russia is threatened, it could respond swiftly ( is there really a risk of World War III and nuclear escalation? We talked about it here ). The warning sounds even more alarming, if linked to the “Tsar’s” belief that the West constitutes “a threat to the very existence of his country”. But what are these “secret” means that the Western allies do not possess? What weapons does the Russian army really have at its disposal?
Means “never seen before”: which ones and how dangerous they are
From nuclear warheads to super intercontinental missiles , passing through submarines and chemical and biological weapons : the Russian war arsenal is certainly one of the most formidable in the world. When he gave his last threatening speech, Putin certainly had in mind the Sarmat , tested last week (here we talked about the…). An intercontinental missile which, according to the Russian president, “has no equal in the world” and which is “capable of evading any defense system”.
Beyond the propaganda and the threat, the Sarmat is indeed a fearsome weapon. It is a ballistic missile with atomic capability that can hit the United States in a very short time. A 200-ton “monster” capable of carrying 15 nuclear warheads and dropping them along a flight path of up to 18,000 kilometers.
Then there are the now famous hypersonic missiles, such as the Kinzhal and the Avangard . Russia has already used them in Ukraine to destroy enemy weapons depots. They are vectors that follow different trajectories than intercontinental ones and that reach a speed at least five times higher than that of sound (6,190 km per hour). Translated: in an hour I am able to hit practically a target anywhere in the world. Among the hypersonic devices there is also the Zircon , with a range of action ranging from 500 to a thousand kilometers.
However, the Kremlin’s missile equipment does not end here. The list also includes nuclear-powered cruise warheads, such as the Burevestnik . It is a technology that you don’t have a lot of information about. It is estimated that it has a range of between 10 thousand and 20 thousand kilometers and that it proceeds at low altitude ( here we are talking about which weapons Italy will send to Ukraine ).
Not just missiles: what other weapons can Putin deploy?
The Russian Armed Forces can also count on submarine military vehicles . In this category the Poseidon stands out which, as its name indicates, is an underwater vector that can travel up to a thousand meters deep at a speed of 70 knots. It is able to proceed unmanned, autonomously, with autonomous propulsion. Its cobalt-60 nuclear warhead can hit both naval formations and coastal targets, causing damage inland.
Speaking of bombs , the most dangerous seems to be the so -called Fab-3000 , which ended up in newspapers around the world in the early days of the siege of the Azovstal steel plant in Mariupol (here we have explained how…). It is a super device that contains a significant amount of explosives, with a destruction range of 46 meters and a scattering radius of the fragments of 260 meters. Not only. They would be able to penetrate armor up to 288mm thick
In addition to missiles and nuclear warheads, during the various phases of the conflict in Ukraine – since 2014 – there has often been talk of biological weapons and chemical weapons ( here is what we know about chemical weapons in Putin’s hands ). Russia knows them well, since it has endorsed their use in Syria by the troops of ally Bashar Al Assad . The extreme danger of these weapons lies in the mix between high explosive content and gas or toxins capable of spreading the chemical agent or contagion. In the first case, suffocating agents such as chlorine could be used,blister agents that affect through inhalation and contact, nerve agents . In the case of biological weapons, however, one of the main threats appears to be anthrax (or carbuncle). Western intelligence has repeatedly feared the possibility that Putin could use them in this phase of the war.
The Nuclear Threat: Should We Be Worried?
After the atomic bomb was dropped on Japan , the whole world raised its right hand swearing that such a tragedy would never happen again. But then came the Cold War , which behind the mutual nuclear threats of the opposing blocs of the United States and the Soviet Union built a deadlock on which to keep the peace and avoid World War III . They call it “Mad” , an acronym from the English “Mutual assured destruction” , also called the theory of mutual assured destruction. Put simply: the large-scale use of nuclear weapons would result in the complete annihilation of the attacked country, but also of the attacker).
Today, however, much, if not everything, seems to have changed. Putin’s constant references to the Russian atomic arsenal seem to archive the concept of nuclear deterrence . And the available newspapers do the rest (here you can find the ranking and the list of countries with the most nuclear weapons in the world).
However, the opportunity for nuclear war seems decidedly impractical . The “Mad” theory continues to appear valid and real especially in Washington and Kiev, according to which there are no concrete signs of such a degeneration of the conflict. And, although the CIA warns the danger of underestimating Putin’s threats, it is appropriate to make a distinction between strategic and tactical nuclear weapons.
Tactical weapons and strategic weapons
In the second half of the last century, the nuclear weapons with which the United States and the USSR could have hit each other were of a strategic type : that is to say, they could be used directly from one’s own territory with devastating effects. An effective deterrent, which has made it possible to maintain relative peace.
Current tactical nuclear weapons , on the other hand, have a shorter range and strike over shorter distances. We are talking about smaller bombs than the classic ones, with a range of about one and a half kilometers. In the Russian arsenal there are about two thousand of them , all still to be “triggered” ( Putin’s war is also economic: this is why he cut off the gas in Poland of Bulgaria ).
Be careful though. Because the smallest Russian nuclear weapon already has an impressive charge: it reaches up to one kiloton , the equivalent of a thousand tons of TNT. The largest bomb can reach as much as 100 kilotons . To get an idea: the Little Boy atomic bomb , which killed 146,000 people in Hiroshima , had a charge of 15 kilotons . Not only that: these warheads can be launched with means that multiply their range and speed. As Corriere della Sera recalls , the systems are essentially two:
- Kalibr missiles : 6.2 meters long and with a range of 1,500-2,500 kilometers.
- The Iskander-M system : it is activated from the ground and has a range of 400-500 kilometers.
India has strongly condemned the killing of civilians in the Ukrainian town of Bocha. It has called for an independent inquiry into the killings. This is the first time that India has used harsh words on civilian deaths in Ukraine.
India has refrained from blaming Russia for the killings in Ukraine. But this is the first time it has used the word “condemnation” in its public statement on the Ukraine war.
UN Secretary-General Anders Fogh Rasmussen has called for an independent inquiry into the killings.
The statement was made by Permanent Representative of India to the UN TS Trimurthy during a meeting of the Security Council on Ukraine. The President of Ukraine Volodymyr Zelensky also addressed the meeting via video conferencing.
Russia denies killing civilians in Bocha Moscow says the photos of the bodies being shown were made in a photoshop. Russian forces have avoided targeting civilians from the beginning. That is why this war is taking so long.
Foreign Minister SJ Shankar in his statement in the Lok Sabha condemned the killings in Bocha and supported the demand for an independent inquiry.
Regarding the killings in Bocha, J. Shankar said that India was disturbed by these reports. We strongly condemn the deaths that have taken place there. This is a serious matter and India supports its independent investigation.
Prior to Trimurti’s statement, Indian Foreign Minister Dr SJ Shankar had a telephone conversation with his US counterpart Anthony Blanken. The two spoke for the second time in a week.
TS Trimurti said the recent killings of civilians in Bocha were disturbing. New Delhi strongly condemns it and supports the demand for an independent inquiry.
Is India’s position changing?
Following Trimurti’s statement on civilian casualties in Bocha, the question is being raised as to whether India’s position on Ukraine is changing.
Dr. Zakir Hussain, a senior analyst on international affairs, told VOA that TS Trimurthy’s statement should not be taken to mean that India’s position is changing.
It should be noted that India and Russia have so far taken a neutral and balanced stance on the Ukraine conflict.
It abstained from voting on resolutions condemning Russia at the UN Security Council and other platforms.
Dr. Zakir Hussain says that it is true that India has used the word ‘condemnation’ for the first time but it is also true that it did not mention Russia in its statement. He spoke in support of the US Alliance, but said that maintaining some independence was important.
People are not stupid. They know what India means by this condemnation.
‘US is putting pressure on India’
Government sources are also denying any change in India’s position. According to him, India’s demand for an independent inquiry is in support of the UN Secretary General’s proposal. This does not mean that India is changing its stance on the Ukraine-Russia war.
Referring to New Delhi’s efforts, he added that India has also tried to please the United States in recent times. It has increased oil and gas imports from the United States by 11%. India imports most of its energy from the United States. About 18 to 20 percent of US oil is coming to India.
In his view, India’s position is based on its own national interests. It is also a fact that he cannot completely ignore the United States and he cannot leave Russia. India is dependent on Russia for weapons and energy.
Source : Voice of America Urdu Service Website
Anonymous is threatening smartphone manufacturers who are still doing business Russia.
The group has published another list of companies who are still present in the local market.
This one is relatively long and we can find many manufacturers of smartphones, electronics, and other companies from the broadly understood IT field. They said that all of them should expect attacks from hackers. The attacks would be carried to force these companies live Russia.
There are many indications that the hackers will be much more furious than before. All because of the massacre in Bucza, during which Russian soldiers left behind tortured bodies, and raped women and children. The Anonymous Group openly states that every company that has stayed in Russia has a share of this tragedy:
What more evidence is needed for these international companies that continue to do bloody business in Russia? If it is difficult for you to leave Russia immediately, even after the #BuchaMassacre massacre, it will be easy for us to include you in the #OpRussia campaign. #Anonymous
Hacktivists have also prepared a list of companies that should expect an attack. We will find there such companies as:
Palki Sharma puts before us some facts which will tell you who are responsible for the war?